Predictive genetic testing for Alzheimer's disease: impact upon risk perception.

TitlePredictive genetic testing for Alzheimer's disease: impact upon risk perception.
Publication TypeJournal Article
Year of Publication2005
AuthorsMarteau, T. M., Roberts, S., LaRusse, S., & Green, R. C.
JournalRisk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis
Volume25
Issue2
Pagination397-404
Date Published2005 Apr
ISSN0272-4332
KeywordsAge Factors, Alzheimer Disease, Apolipoproteins E, Family Health, Female, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genotype, Humans, Male, Perception, Random Allocation, Risk, Risk Assessment, Risk Factors, Sex Factors, Time Factors
Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the impact on risk perceptions of disclosing genetic test results used to estimate the risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD). Adult children (n = 149) of people with AD were randomized to one of two groups--Intervention group: lifetime risk estimates of AD based on age, gender, family history, and Apolipoprotein E (APOE) genotype; Control group: lifetime risk estimates of AD based on the same risk factors excluding APOE genotype. Perceptions of personal risk (PPR) for AD were assessed six weeks after risk assessments. PPR were correlated with actual lifetime risk estimates (r = 0.501; p < 0.0001). After controlling for lifetime risks communicated to participants, age, and number of affected relatives, PPR scores among those with an epsilon4-positive test result (the test result associated with increased AD susceptibility) (adjusted mean: 3.4 (SD: 0.7)) were not different from the PPR scores in the Control group (adjusted mean: 3.4 (SD: 0.7) (F1,91= 1.98; p = 0.162). Again, controlling for lifetime risk estimates, age, and number of affected relatives, the PPR score of those receiving an epsilon4-negative test result was significantly lower (adjusted mean: 3.1 (SD: 0.8)) than those in the Control group (adjusted mean: 3.4 (SD: 0.7) (F1,95 = 6.23; p = 0.014). Perceptions of risk of developing AD are influenced by genetic test disclosure in those receiving epsilon4-negative, but not those receiving epsilon4-positive test results. Despite the reduced perceptions of risk in the former group, there was no evidence of false reassurance (i.e., perceiving risks as equal to or lower than population risks of AD), although this possibility should be assessed in other testing contexts.

Alternate JournalRisk Anal.